Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
- Marc Venken
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:51 am
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
I also have a Synology DS218 that I use for the backups. I see that this can also be used as server ?
Is that a option to work with or just keep the DS218 as backup media ?
Excluding some or more options )))
Is that a option to work with or just keep the DS218 as backup media ?
Excluding some or more options )))
Marc Venken
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
-
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:41 am
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
I have several clients that use a Synology NAS as server.Marc Venken wrote:I also have a Synology DS218 that I use for the backups. I see that this can also be used as server ?
I have to say that then all are converted to SQL. On a Synology NAS you van install the MariaDB package, and it work very nice with FW
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
You can also use it with CDX, but that is slower than SQL
Regards,
Marc
FWH32+xHarbour | FWH64+Harbour | BCC | DBF | ADO+MySQL | ADO+MariaDB | ADO+SQLite
Marc
FWH32+xHarbour | FWH64+Harbour | BCC | DBF | ADO+MySQL | ADO+MariaDB | ADO+SQLite
- Marc Venken
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:51 am
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
But with the NAS, they are using it as a Peer to Peer system I suppose? Not the way like the server solution of Otto ?Marc Vanzegbroeck wrote:I have several clients that use a Synology NAS as server.Marc Venken wrote:I also have a Synology DS218 that I use for the backups. I see that this can also be used as server ?
I have to say that then all are converted to SQL. On a Synology NAS you van install the MariaDB package, and it work very nice with FW![]()
You can also use it with CDX, but that is slower than SQL
Marc Venken
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
-
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:41 am
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Do you mean not with Remote Desktop (Terminal Server)? Indeed, but if you use it with SQL it's very fastMarc Venken wrote:But with the NAS, they are using it as a Peer to Peer system I suppose? Not the way like the server solution of Otto ?Marc Vanzegbroeck wrote:I have several clients that use a Synology NAS as server.Marc Venken wrote:I also have a Synology DS218 that I use for the backups. I see that this can also be used as server ?
I have to say that then all are converted to SQL. On a Synology NAS you van install the MariaDB package, and it work very nice with FW![]()
You can also use it with CDX, but that is slower than SQL
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
On some Synology NAS, like mine, you can also run VMWare. So you can install an Virtual Microsoft server. But a normal PC will be faster.
I don't use my NAS as VMWare server. I have a seperate ESXi-server, running several VMWare's.
Regards,
Marc
FWH32+xHarbour | FWH64+Harbour | BCC | DBF | ADO+MySQL | ADO+MariaDB | ADO+SQLite
Marc
FWH32+xHarbour | FWH64+Harbour | BCC | DBF | ADO+MySQL | ADO+MariaDB | ADO+SQLite
- Marc Venken
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:51 am
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Marc, Michel,
From My region
Where do you go for your hardware ?
Ik know : VBC in Bree en Bells (meerdere locaties) of Coolblue
From My region
Where do you go for your hardware ?
Ik know : VBC in Bree en Bells (meerdere locaties) of Coolblue
Marc Venken
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Hello Marc,
Just as a test, we virtualized WINDOWS on a Synology and tested it with RDP.
But the performance is not adequate.
I think then you would need a model of the 3600 series.
Best regards,
Otto
Just as a test, we virtualized WINDOWS on a Synology and tested it with RDP.
But the performance is not adequate.
I think then you would need a model of the 3600 series.
Best regards,
Otto
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
********************************************************************
- Marc Venken
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:51 am
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Thanks.. I will use the Nas for backups and a new Laptop/Desktop system when I start with RDP.Otto wrote:Hello Marc,
Just as a test, we virtualized WINDOWS on a Synology and tested it with RDP.
But the performance is not adequate.
I think then you would need a model of the 3600 series.
Best regards,
Otto
Marc Venken
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Marc Vanzegbroeck, may I ask what SQL could bring for such small applications as ours.
I think the lack of the dBase Editor (DBU) alone cannot be substituted.
By the time phpMyAdmin starts, I already have done all the work with DBU.
I am convinced that RDP, DBF and the other formats (xml, doc, xls, jpg, etc. ) and the inclusion of the filesystem of the operating system enable so much that it does not make sense to include an additional layer.
Best regards,
Otto
I think the lack of the dBase Editor (DBU) alone cannot be substituted.
By the time phpMyAdmin starts, I already have done all the work with DBU.
I am convinced that RDP, DBF and the other formats (xml, doc, xls, jpg, etc. ) and the inclusion of the filesystem of the operating system enable so much that it does not make sense to include an additional layer.
Best regards,
Otto
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
********************************************************************
- Marc Venken
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:51 am
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Otto,
I don't think that sql users are using phpmyadmin a lot now a days.
There is free software like Heidisql that is a great DBU system for SQL.
I don't think that sql users are using phpmyadmin a lot now a days.
There is free software like Heidisql that is a great DBU system for SQL.
Marc Venken
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
- Marc Venken
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:51 am
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Otto, what do you think ? 2016 or 2019. As far as I see 2016 will be stopped updating end this year.Marc Venken wrote:Do I look for the windows server software 2019 or 2016 ? Maybe 2019 is overkill ?
I did not see any prices for them, but will look them up today.
Marc Venken
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Using: FWH 20.08 with Harbour
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Marc,
I would only buy 2019.
Then you are on the pulse of the time.
It's not about customer systems, it's about you.
Best regards,
Otto
I would only buy 2019.
Then you are on the pulse of the time.
It's not about customer systems, it's about you.
Best regards,
Otto
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
********************************************************************
Re: Peer to Peer, NAS and NTX -> CDX
Marc,
Source text
I have used HEIDISQL before I used phpmyAdmin.
Mr. Rao then worked on a phpmyAdmin clone based on xBrowse. But there was practically no interest and the project is asleep.
This clone would be a killer app.
But there is nothing better than direct access via dbf.
I'm talking about programs like you and I do.
If you work for a corporation or for foreign bosses, it's a little different.
Best regards,
Otto
Source text
I have used HEIDISQL before I used phpmyAdmin.
Mr. Rao then worked on a phpmyAdmin clone based on xBrowse. But there was practically no interest and the project is asleep.
This clone would be a killer app.
But there is nothing better than direct access via dbf.
I'm talking about programs like you and I do.
If you work for a corporation or for foreign bosses, it's a little different.
Best regards,
Otto
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
********************************************************************
mod harbour - Vamos a la conquista de la Web
modharbour.org
********************************************************************