Migrating to Harbour
- Antonio Linares
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37481
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Spain
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
Enrico,
I never migrated to Harbour I use Harbour since its very early beginning.
And never had the need to copy a file with non-ascii characters.
I never migrated to Harbour I use Harbour since its very early beginning.
And never had the need to copy a file with non-ascii characters.
- Enrico Maria Giordano
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Roma - Italia
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
I can't believe this. Spanish has non-ascii characters. What if you have to copy a user document with unpredictable filename?Antonio Linares wrote:And never had the need to copy a file with non-ascii characters.
EMG
- James Bott
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
Enrico,
I am wondering if xHarbour is already requesting the same codepage, and if so, then you already are using something related to a specific language. Have you looked at the source code for xHarbour for the codepage (using a global search)? Or, maybe just reviewing the source for memowrit() and copyfile() would turn up something.Is that correct? I would prefer to not use something related to a specific language.
- Antonio Linares
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37481
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Spain
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
Enrico,
I am mostly a system developer not an application developer
I am mostly a system developer not an application developer
- Enrico Maria Giordano
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Roma - Italia
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
James,
EMG
Just searched. It's not so easy to understand the code. Anyway, I found nothing related to unicode.James Bott wrote:Enrico,
I am wondering if xHarbour is already requesting the same codepage, and if so, then you already are using something related to a specific language. Have you looked at the source code for xHarbour for the codepage (using a global search)? Or, maybe just reviewing the source for memowrit()Is that correct? I would prefer to not use something related to a specific language.
CopyFile() is a Windows API function. I'm very confused...James Bott wrote:and copyfile() would turn up something.
EMG
- Enrico Maria Giordano
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Roma - Italia
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
Antonio,
EMG
Ok. But what about the other friends that already migrated to Harbour? Am I the only one with these problems? I can't believe that...Antonio Linares wrote:Enrico,
I am mostly a system developer not an application developer
EMG
- Antonio Linares
- Site Admin
- Posts: 37481
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
- Location: Spain
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
Enrico,
You got it working, so surely you did it the right way
You got it working, so surely you did it the right way
- James Bott
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
Enrico,
If Harbour is not calling the codepage anywhere then maybe that is the problem. If you can find it called in xHarbour then that would seem to confirm that is the difference between the two languages.
I was just thinking that if they are using a codepage that it may be getting called in the code for the API call.CopyFile() is a Windows API function. I'm very confused...
If Harbour is not calling the codepage anywhere then maybe that is the problem. If you can find it called in xHarbour then that would seem to confirm that is the difference between the two languages.
Re: Migrating to Harbour
Enrico,
I am an application developer ...
I've been using xBase variants for over 32 years ( back to dBase II with the Ashton Tate runtime license on a CP/M machine ).
Previously I used xHarbour( .com ) version and still have it building a distribution version of my application.
I also have a fully functioning build of the same program using Harbour, FWH, and Microsoft Visual C++ 2013 ( Visual Studio 2013 Professional, with latest updates )
I use one set of source code for both builds. I use Ultra Edit Studio and have a native build ( Windows ) and a called routine ( xHarbour builder ). Thus I only have one set of source code to revise, enhance and build.
I have no problems building working code. The only issue I have is with Harbour and the ADS drivers. I have a version of the libs for xharbour that work with all versions of ADS, but the one I have for Harbour only works with ADS 9 and above.
I am currently working on a new version of my software built completely within Visual Studio 2013, using Harbour and FWH.
ALL of my projects are fully functional, and I have no build problems in any of the 3.
I believe you use Borland. I do not so I can't share anything about how it might work. Perhaps you have some functions tuned for Borland and that is where your problem lies. I can assure you that the tools I am using are working very well, they are fast, and there are no current problems.
Tim
I am an application developer ...
I've been using xBase variants for over 32 years ( back to dBase II with the Ashton Tate runtime license on a CP/M machine ).
Previously I used xHarbour( .com ) version and still have it building a distribution version of my application.
I also have a fully functioning build of the same program using Harbour, FWH, and Microsoft Visual C++ 2013 ( Visual Studio 2013 Professional, with latest updates )
I use one set of source code for both builds. I use Ultra Edit Studio and have a native build ( Windows ) and a called routine ( xHarbour builder ). Thus I only have one set of source code to revise, enhance and build.
I have no problems building working code. The only issue I have is with Harbour and the ADS drivers. I have a version of the libs for xharbour that work with all versions of ADS, but the one I have for Harbour only works with ADS 9 and above.
I am currently working on a new version of my software built completely within Visual Studio 2013, using Harbour and FWH.
ALL of my projects are fully functional, and I have no build problems in any of the 3.
I believe you use Borland. I do not so I can't share anything about how it might work. Perhaps you have some functions tuned for Borland and that is where your problem lies. I can assure you that the tools I am using are working very well, they are fast, and there are no current problems.
Tim
Tim Stone
http://www.MasterLinkSoftware.com
timstone@masterlinksoftware.com
Using: FWH 19.06 with Harbour 3.2.0 / Microsoft Visual Studio Community 2019
http://www.MasterLinkSoftware.com
timstone@masterlinksoftware.com
Using: FWH 19.06 with Harbour 3.2.0 / Microsoft Visual Studio Community 2019
- Enrico Maria Giordano
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Roma - Italia
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
No ... I really can't now. Sorry.
I am in the middle of a huge amount of work. I am taking 33 years of code and optimizing it into classes. I find a lot of repetitive functions that I can eliminate ( 3 or 4 functions in different areas of the application that all do basically the same thing and can be reduced to 1 ). There are over 110 .prg files, some with over 8000 lines of code.
This is all being done with Visual Studio 2013 ( soon to be tested with VS 2015 preview ), FWH, and Harbour. It is also being tested on Windows 10 preview AND EVERYTHING IS WORKING.
I just wanted to let you know that I have been 100% successful with Harbour and MSFT Visual Studio languages.
Tim
I am in the middle of a huge amount of work. I am taking 33 years of code and optimizing it into classes. I find a lot of repetitive functions that I can eliminate ( 3 or 4 functions in different areas of the application that all do basically the same thing and can be reduced to 1 ). There are over 110 .prg files, some with over 8000 lines of code.
This is all being done with Visual Studio 2013 ( soon to be tested with VS 2015 preview ), FWH, and Harbour. It is also being tested on Windows 10 preview AND EVERYTHING IS WORKING.
I just wanted to let you know that I have been 100% successful with Harbour and MSFT Visual Studio languages.
Tim
Tim Stone
http://www.MasterLinkSoftware.com
timstone@masterlinksoftware.com
Using: FWH 19.06 with Harbour 3.2.0 / Microsoft Visual Studio Community 2019
http://www.MasterLinkSoftware.com
timstone@masterlinksoftware.com
Using: FWH 19.06 with Harbour 3.2.0 / Microsoft Visual Studio Community 2019
- James Bott
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
Enrico,
Are you only having issues with the memoWrit(), copyfile(), and memoLine() routines and everything thing else is working? Or, have you found other issues?
Are you only having issues with the memoWrit(), copyfile(), and memoLine() routines and everything thing else is working? Or, have you found other issues?
- Enrico Maria Giordano
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Roma - Italia
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
James,
Anyway, I would like to fix that issues before keeping on...
EMG
At the moment I'm very tired of Harbour.James Bott wrote:Are you only having issues with the memoWrit(), copyfile(), and memoLine() routines and everything thing else is working? Or, have you found other issues?
Anyway, I would like to fix that issues before keeping on...
EMG
- James Bott
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
I was just thinking that those are very specific issues for you but maybe not for everyone.
It seems that at the very worst you could compile those three functions from xHarbour and link them into your app when compiling with Harbour and that would get you a running app (provided there aren't other issues too).
Isn't there a Harbour forum where you might post your problems? Maybe then they would get fixed.
I might also point out that these may not be considered bugs, but rather things that xHarbour supports that Harbour doesn't. If you were moving from Harbour to xHarbour I expect you would also find incompatibilities.
It seems that at the very worst you could compile those three functions from xHarbour and link them into your app when compiling with Harbour and that would get you a running app (provided there aren't other issues too).
Isn't there a Harbour forum where you might post your problems? Maybe then they would get fixed.
I might also point out that these may not be considered bugs, but rather things that xHarbour supports that Harbour doesn't. If you were moving from Harbour to xHarbour I expect you would also find incompatibilities.
- Enrico Maria Giordano
- Posts: 7355
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Roma - Italia
- Contact:
Re: Migrating to Harbour
James,
EMG
That's exactly what I'm trying to do.James Bott wrote:I was just thinking that those are very specific issues for you but maybe not for everyone.
It seems that at the very worst you could compile those three functions from xHarbour and link them into your app when compiling with Harbour and that would get you a running app (provided there aren't other issues too).
I dropped Harbour years ago because of the bad attitude of its developers (specifically Viktor).James Bott wrote:Isn't there a Harbour forum where you might post your problems? Maybe then they would get fixed.
Ok, I'll going on, we'll see...James Bott wrote:I might also point out that these may not be considered bugs, but rather things that xHarbour supports that Harbour doesn't. If you were moving from Harbour to xHarbour I expect you would also find incompatibilities.
EMG