Codejock Calendar Samples?

[Richard Chidiak]

Antonio,

My pleasure , i would be glad to help

I will publish a copy of my codejock program running (same program) with Xharbour and Harbour

Massimo : Sorry about the link, we had a hack on our servers 3 months ago and we had to reinstall almost everything, this sample was not backed.

I can provide any help on Codejock if you need, just let me know.

Just to mention, i have moved all my applications from xharbour/bcc 5.82 to Harbour/MSVC 2010.

Regards,

Richard

[Massimo Linossi]

Thanks Richard, very kind.
No problem with the link, I've made some tests with the one that Antonio has published.
The problem is that I receive some errors when I try to run it. And if I correct one line there is another one
that is generating another error. And so on. So I think that the problem is not the code but the compiler,
because if you have published that code, it was working. For these reasons I want to change the compiler and
to pass to Harbour, and to test also MSVC.
When I'm ready to make the transition, If I can ask something to you it will be a great help.
Thanks a lot.
Massimo

[TimStone]

Massimo and Richard,

I am also working with Codejock. I originally had it running perfectly with xHarbour ( .com ), but I've been transition my primary application to Harbour / MSVC 2010.

I have further testing to do with some of my other ActiveX controls, but so far it looks like everything is running well. I don't do major updates for my clients over the summer ( only smaller modifications automatically updated ). However, my goal is to release for general use the MSVC version in September.

I would strongly encourage people to make this shift. Ultimately I think we will see more potential for integration. Yes, we are likely to also do the shift to 2012 Visual Studio with Harbour / FWH. There is great potential there.

Richard, you can also share my calendar program because I believe it is an easier implementation. Just remove the license key .... but I think you already have it without that.

Tim

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

Enrico,

Could you provide a small self contained example ? thanks

Here it is:

Code: Select all

FUNCTION MAIN()

    LOCAL hBkg := HB_BACKGROUNDADD( { || Tone( 440, 1 ) }, 10, .F. )
    LOCAL hIdl := HB_IDLEADD( { || HB_BackGroundRun( hBkg ) } )

    SET BACKGROUND TASKS ON

    HB_BACKGROUNDACTIVE( hBkg, .T. )

    INKEY( 0 )

    SET BACKGROUND TASKS OFF

    HB_BACKGROUNDDEL( hBkg )

    HB_IDLEDEL( hIdl )

    RETURN NIL

EMG

[Antonio Linares]

Enrico,

Here you can review Harbour threads management great examples:

https://github.com/harbour/core/tree/master/tests/mt

Surely there are some that are very similar. I wonder if xharbour supports them.

I think that we could implement the function HB_BACKGROUNDADD() using Harbour functions...

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

What if I don't want to use multithreading libs (they would inflate my EXEs, I suppose)?

EMG

[lucasdebeltran]

Mr. Enrico,

Why are you afraid with exe sizes with present Ram sizes of the Pcs?.

Also, I indicated you some swithcs for latest BCC to reduce size. Are you happy with them?.

Thank you.

[Antonio Linares]

Enrico,

Here you have a Harbour example similar to yours:

Code: Select all

#include "FiveWin.ch"

function Main()

   local thID := hb_threadStart( @thFunc() )

   MsgInfo( "ok" )

return nil

function thFunc()

   local n 
   
   for n = 1 to 10
      Tone( 440, 1 )
   next   
   
return nil

[Antonio Linares]

Using a codeblock:

Code: Select all

#include "FiveWin.ch"

static bAction

function Main()

   local thId

   bAction = { || Tone( 440, 1 ) }
   thId = hb_threadStart( @thFunc() )

   MsgInfo( "ok" )

return nil

function thFunc()

   local n 
   
   for n = 1 to 10
      Eval( bAction )
   next   
   
return nil

[Antonio Linares]

In order to build those examples hbvmmt.lib has to be linked instead of hbvm.lib

and also from Borland, we have to link cw32mt.lib instead of cw32.lib

[Antonio Linares]

Enrico,

My example size built using threads is 2.515.416 bytes

without threads: 2.486.784 bytes

very little difference

[Antonio Linares]

Enrico,

Keep in mind that if you are not using threads then you are slicing the Harbour virtual machine execution process and slowing the whole app.

[Antonio Linares]

Understanding Harbour MultiThread:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xxR ... q0MVg/edit

Harbour MT Mode and ST Mode

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S2I ... bZOdI/edit

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

Thank you Master. I'll try it.

EMG

[Enrico Maria Giordano]

Sorry, the background task is only one of the incompatibilities I found. The warnings is another one (see an old thread on this subject).

EMG