Latest Harbour SVN

Post Reply
toninhofwi
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:01 am

Latest Harbour SVN

Post by toninhofwi »

Hi Antonio.

Are you get GPF upon app exit with latest Harbour SVN please? I'd compiled all my modules with full debug information but I can't catch it.

I'm using codegear 5.9 but I see in Harbour dev list that Luis Krause have the same problem with bcc 5.5.1

TIA and best regards,

Toninho.
User avatar
Rick Lipkin
Posts: 2397
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:50 pm
Location: Columbia, South Carolina USA

Post by Rick Lipkin »

Toninho

If I recall .. there is an incompatability with FWH 8x and the animated gif obj and Borland C++ > 5.5.

I was using Borland 5.82 and Antonio tried to make it work but there are some incompabilities.

If this is what you are seeing .. I would highly recommend you drop back to the Borland C++ 5.5 version ..

Also .. I know with xHarbour there was ( a few months ago ) a 'planned' error on exit if you did not NIL out a TOleAuto() 'static' object that was still hanging around when your program quit.

Rick Lipkin
toninhofwi
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:01 am

Post by toninhofwi »

Rick Lipkin wrote:Toninho

If I recall .. there is an incompatability with FWH 8x and the animated gif obj and Borland C++ > 5.5.

Also .. I know with xHarbour there was ( a few months ago ) a 'planned' error on exit if you did not NIL out a TOleAuto() 'static' object that was still hanging around when your program quit.

Rick Lipkin
Hi Rick.

My application is running fine with XH and with Harbour 1.0. Only yesterday, after Przemek's changes in Harbour this problem appear.

BTW, I remove OLE and ANIGIF from FWH libs and make single functions like:

function createobjetc() ; return

to see is this is the problem, but gpf persist.

I try do compile all prg/c files of Harbour/FWH/Myapp with FULL DEBUG information and when I get the GPF I receive NO LINES... maybe because the problem is in FWH function that I can't compile because I don't have sources...

Thanks and best regards,

Toninho.
User avatar
Antonio Linares
Site Admin
Posts: 37481
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Post by Antonio Linares »

Toninho,

Whats the FWH function that is causing the GPF ?

We can recompile it here and send it to you
regards, saludos

Antonio Linares
www.fivetechsoft.com
toninhofwi
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:01 am

Post by toninhofwi »

Antonio Linares wrote:Toninho,

Whats the FWH function that is causing the GPF ?

We can recompile it here and send it to you
Hi Antonio, thanks, but I don't know. Maybe the problem is in FWH but this is not 100% sure.

I'm suspect that is caused by FWH, because, same using FULL DEBUG information in all my files, my log is:

Call Tree:
0x0049CF72(=ca.exe:0x01:09BF72)
0x00450239(=ca.exe:0x01:04F239)
0x7C862CD3(=kernel32.dll:0x01:061CD3)
0x004B548B(=ca.exe:0x01:0B448B)
0x7C9037BF(=ntdll.dll:0x01:0027BF)
0x7C90378B(=ntdll.dll:0x01:00278B)

No lines information, no functions names... maybe any fwh function that don't have debug information?

Regards,

Toninho.
User avatar
Antonio Linares
Site Admin
Posts: 37481
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Post by Antonio Linares »

Toninho,

Could you provide a PRG example to reproduce the GPF ? thanks,
regards, saludos

Antonio Linares
www.fivetechsoft.com
toninhofwi
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:01 am

Post by toninhofwi »

Antonio Linares wrote:Toninho,

Could you provide a PRG example to reproduce the GPF ? thanks,
Antonio, I´m trying, but all samples in FWH\samples dir seems to work fine under latest SVN.

Chen send me important informations about codeguard flags. I´ll look at it.

Thanks and best regards,

Toninho.
Post Reply