Hello,
When i run my application under W. Vista, the application ICON is not found by Vista. This work fine under 98 and XP, but not under Vista
32 bits. I use the Blinker command 'RC' to link rc file in my application.
Is someone have fixe this bug ?
Icon application and Vista
- Badara Thiam
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:21 am
- Location: France
- Contact:
Icon application and Vista
Badara Thiam
http://www.icim.fr
http://www.icim.fr
- Badara Thiam
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:21 am
- Location: France
- Contact:
Dutch,
I don't know what is exactly a short cut menu.
Is it possible to see the application icon under
Windows without run the application if i do this ?
Regards.
I don't know what is exactly a short cut menu.
Is it possible to see the application icon under
Windows without run the application if i do this ?
Regards.
Badara Thiam
http://www.icim.fr
http://www.icim.fr
- Badara Thiam
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:21 am
- Location: France
- Contact:
Dutch,
Yes, i know it's possible to choose an icon
in the properties of the application.
But my users must separately do this also...
Thank you.
Regards.
Yes, i know it's possible to choose an icon
in the properties of the application.
But my users must separately do this also...
Thank you.
Regards.
Badara Thiam
http://www.icim.fr
http://www.icim.fr
- James Bott
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
- Contact:
- Badara Thiam
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:21 am
- Location: France
- Contact:
James,
I need to keep my 16 bits version for the stability than
i have now with my Clipper with Fivewin programs.
I run now 32 bits application with Harbour but i have
again some problems of portability, like .exe compression
(Blinker out ?), printers, zip files.
It is not simple to migrate to Harbour a big application.
Is think fews problems put the developper into a no man's land
from where he never return, if he have not the absolute
necessity to go all the way.
"Clipper" -> "Harbour" is not simple
but : "Clipper" -> "Nothing else" is the dead.
Thanks to all developpers (or contributers) of Harbour for this product !
Regards.
I need to keep my 16 bits version for the stability than
i have now with my Clipper with Fivewin programs.
I run now 32 bits application with Harbour but i have
again some problems of portability, like .exe compression
(Blinker out ?), printers, zip files.
It is not simple to migrate to Harbour a big application.
Is think fews problems put the developper into a no man's land
from where he never return, if he have not the absolute
necessity to go all the way.
"Clipper" -> "Harbour" is not simple
but : "Clipper" -> "Nothing else" is the dead.
Thanks to all developpers (or contributers) of Harbour for this product !
Regards.
Badara Thiam
http://www.icim.fr
http://www.icim.fr
- James Bott
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
- Contact:
Badera,
I'm not sure why you need exe compression and/or what that has to do with stability? Anyhow, here is a compression tool that someone else is using with FWH.
http://www.aspack.com
Printers are handled much better with 32bit apps. Do you have a specific problem with printers with 32bit apps? There are actually a number of printer incompatibilities with the newer printer drivers and 16bit apps which will go away when you convert to 32bit.
You can also do zipping with 32bit FWH. There are different libs for that. There was a recent discussion about this (including sample code) in the FWH newsgroup.
>It is not simple to migrate to Harbour a big application.
>Is think fews problems put the developer into a no man's land
>from where he never return, if he have not the absolute
>necessity to go all the way.
If you are referring to the ones mentioned above, then I don't think it is going to be as hard as you think.
>"Clipper" -> "Harbour" is not simple
>but : "Clipper" -> "Nothing else" is the dead.
Clipper to Harbour is pretty simple in my experience. And as you said there is nothing else. It is not a matter of if you will convert, but when.
Regards,
James
I need to keep my 16 bits version for the stability than
i have now with my Clipper with Fivewin programs.
I run now 32 bits application with Harbour but i have
again some problems of portability, like .exe compression
(Blinker out ?), printers, zip files.
I'm not sure why you need exe compression and/or what that has to do with stability? Anyhow, here is a compression tool that someone else is using with FWH.
http://www.aspack.com
Printers are handled much better with 32bit apps. Do you have a specific problem with printers with 32bit apps? There are actually a number of printer incompatibilities with the newer printer drivers and 16bit apps which will go away when you convert to 32bit.
You can also do zipping with 32bit FWH. There are different libs for that. There was a recent discussion about this (including sample code) in the FWH newsgroup.
>It is not simple to migrate to Harbour a big application.
>Is think fews problems put the developer into a no man's land
>from where he never return, if he have not the absolute
>necessity to go all the way.
If you are referring to the ones mentioned above, then I don't think it is going to be as hard as you think.
>"Clipper" -> "Harbour" is not simple
>but : "Clipper" -> "Nothing else" is the dead.
Clipper to Harbour is pretty simple in my experience. And as you said there is nothing else. It is not a matter of if you will convert, but when.
Regards,
James